Thursday, February 4, 2010

Shamsul Azhar is new Petronas president and CEO

Datuk Shamsul Azhar Abbas has been appointed president and chief executive officer of Petronas effective February 10 2010, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak announced today.
He has also been appointed Acting Chairman of the Petronas Board of Directors.

Shamsul Azhar, 57, who served as MISC President and Chief Executive Officer between 2004 and 2009, will replace Tan Sri Mohd Hassan Merican whose contract ends on February 9.

Najib said Shamsul Azhar, who joined Petronas in 1974, has vast experience in the nation's petroleum industry having served in several senior positions, including that of Vice President of Oil Business, Vice President Petrochemicals, Vice President Exploration (Upstream) and Vice President Maritime and Logistics.

"I am confident he is qualified and experienced to bring continued suceess to Petronas," he said.

Najib also thanked Hassan for his invaluable contribution to the nation and petroleum industry having served as Acting Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Petronas since 1995.
Datuk Shamsul Azhar Abbas, the new president and CEO of Petronas  effective Feb 10 2010.
Datuk Shamsul Azhar Abbas, the new president and CEO of Petronas effective Feb 10 2010.
Hassan began his career with the national oil company in 1989 as Senior Vice President, Finance, before being appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in 1995 and later also assumed the position of Acting Chairman in 2004.

Najib said during Hassan's tenure at the national oil company, Petronas enjoyed good repute and excellent standing, internationally, and was the only Fortune 500 company in Malaysia.

"He was also instrumental in bringing Petronas to foreign shores, competing side-by-side with international oil giants," added the Prime Minister.

With vast experience behind him, Najib hoped Hassan would continue to contribute his knowledge and experiene to nation building especially in the energy sector.

Article Source : Bernama
Read more...

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

One vehicle owner, one subsidy

UNDER the new fuel subsidy scheme to be implemented on May 1, all vehicle owners are to receive a fixed amount of petrol subsidy irrespective of the number of vehicles they own or engine capacity of their vehicles.

Motorists who do not own any vehicle will not enjoy the subsidy.

This means that once the quota, believed to be between 100 and 300 litres a month, is used up, the car owner will have to pay the full price at the pump, Sin Chew Daily reported yesterday.

In a follow-up today, the daily quoted Petrol Dealers Association of Malaysia president Datuk Hashim Othman as saying that in line with the “one owner gets petrol subsidy for one car” measure, the government will allow car owners to register their car registration numbers and MyKad through Maybank online or petrol kiosks from April.

He said as far as he understood, the Road Transport Department will link up with the National Registration Department to ensure MyKad carries the registration number of the holder’s vehicle.

Maybank is the sole financial group involved in the scheme so far.

“Come April, vehicle owners who are Maybank2u users can register for petrol subsidy entitlement through the bank online. Those who are unable to access Maybank2u can register with petrol kiosks.”

He said once the measure is given the all-clear, petrol kiosk operators will hire more hands and link up with Maybank online.

“Under the new petrol subsidy mechanism, each owner can register only one vehicle, and the new scheme may use the biometric identification system to ascertain the MyKad holders’ particulars.”

Hashim said the initial proposal is for the quota to be capped at 100 litres a month but because feedback showed the amount is considered inadequate, the authorities concerned have yet to make a final decision.

On talk that the petrol price will go up once the new subsidy scheme is in place, Hashim said this is to reflect the unsubsidised rate when the subsidy is removed.

“Currently, the government provides a subsidy of 30 sen a litre to keep the (RON 95) petrol price at RM1.80 a litre. So once the 30 sen subsidy is removed, the price goes back to RM2.10 a litre. It is not considered as a hike in price.” -- theSun


Article Source : The Sun
Read more...

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Is Malaysia Becoming a Hub For Islamic Finance in Asia?

Yes, Malaysia can be already dubbed as a center for Islamic finance in South East Asia, if not Asia.

Recently, Malaysian Islamic banking groups launched The Corporate Murabahah Master Agreement (CMMA) to boost Islamic finance money market. This is to ensure the market remains vibrant, volatile and nice-to-jump-in. To put it in layman's terms, CMMA is a standard document for deposit taking between financial institutions and corporate customers; where you can see the standard agreement would specify a common modus operandi for Islamic financial institutions in accepting deposits via commodity Murabahah.

But an interesting question quotes: "Do halal financial instruments hold up better than conventional and traditional bonds and stocks?" Or to put it in another way, "Is Islamic finance much safer than conventional finance?"

Islamic Finance: The basis, standard and core concept of Islamic finance has always been in the 'shared risk' area. As a start, you might find this more plausible than conventional trading, since the concept of Islamic finance itself calls for collateral backing by an individual or an entity in the middle of a financial instrument (more famously known as "Sukuk"). Sukuk is an Arabic term for "financial certificate."

Although there may be some arguments to whether many Islamic financial products are structured using LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), a benchmark or reference rate for short-term interest rates worldwide calculated daily), there is no doubt to one thing - Islamic financial models (think concept) disguises its risk profiles to a certain extent. Because ruling on Shariah-compliance has been heavily emphasized and focused, there are a few factors that we could 'miss' - The more important factors to determine whether or not it adds positive value to an economy's financial system.

BUT, halt. That's generalization. Doesn't work this way in all ends. For a country like Malaysia, an economic stronghold in Asia in Islamic finance growing rapidly as an Islamic hub, authorities have considered many ends of conventional banking before introducing sophisticated finance products that are Islamic-based. They have one major problem - "Non-compliance with Islamic principles".

The Asset Way: One of the most famous ways of going about 'interest rates' (as Islamic principles disallow charging of interest rates) is to sell assets. This method has been used for years and there are many ways to go about it. Let's start.

Mr. A wants a RM10,000 personal loan. In conventional banking, the bank lends Mr. A the requested amount of money and charge an interest rate of say 1% per annum. Repayment 5 years. For Islamic financial products, that's not Halal.

So what they do is, the financial institution will take a readily available asset, price it above the agreed rate, sell it to Mr. A and immediately requests that Mr. A sells it back at the 'loan price'. So the bank may sell it to Mr. A at RM20,000 and he will have to sell it back to the financial institution immediately at RM10,000.

Shariah-compliance: Islamic financing has taken a brand new approach in introducing new methods of handling conventional banking; in its essence to serve its own population with compliance to its dos' and do nots'.

Can Islamic financing in Malaysia thrive, with its introductory of what some people call 'pseudo-Islamic Shariah'? Should we look into the ways of what Muslim scholars introduced to us as another way through conventional banking so that we're more secure?

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Ken_Low

Read more...

Friday, January 1, 2010

GST Implementation in Malaysia - The Argument

There were many responses when the Malaysian government first announced the Financial Budget for Malaysia, year 2010, both good and bad. But when they were undecided about GST, it sparked more conversation on whether it'll benefit the Rakyat, or further threaten poorer communities in Malaysia.
What goods GST covers
As proposed by our dear government, GST covers all types of goods & services sold to Malaysian & non-Malaysian residents (therefore consumers) except for a common commodities such as rice, flour & sugar.
This goes to mean: Whenever you walk into your favorite hypermarket with the family to get some groceries in the future, you will be charged additional ~% (the proposed additional 4%) on top of your bill except for certain controlled items.
Further, Malaysia's main revenue shouldn't just live off petroleum. In other words, we shouldn't put all eggs in one basket because petroleum revenues have risks of its own, seeing that it's a natural resource.
What reason did they give? More funds for development and expenses.
How much would they probably get? RM1 billion (RM1,000,000,000) per annum in estimated rounded-up revenue.
Will it hurt the poor & middle class?
To a certain extent, it will somehow affect pockets of middle and lower income group Malaysians.
The arguments:
  1. Recent price hike in petrol, prices of commodities have increased drastically. And now another one called GST?
  2. Income tax brackets for high earners aren't as 'expensive' as middle-to-low income groups.
  3. The Malaysian government has saved approximately RM2 billion (RM2,000,000,000) by lowering fuel subsidies - What's the take on GST now for lower income groups?
  4. GST is tax on SPENDING. Basically, everything from parking fees to purchasing mattress. Even with GST-exempted items, this would still hit lower income groups in Malaysia.
  5. Private sectors aren't paying much to Malaysians - Other more developed countries such as Singapore could take this hit because wages & salaries are much higher.
  6. Other countries such as Britain, India, Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore has GST - Doesn't mean GST has to be implemented in Malaysia. Their economic status and way of gaining revenue varies from Malaysia. (GST is also called VAT - Value Added Tax in other countries)
  7. Inflation may happen. Prime Minister Mr. Najib has guaranteed no inflation - But with the introduction of GST, the chain of 'passing the cost' will end up usually at the hands of consumers.
  8. Corruption isn't a rare thing in Malaysia - So businesses has already included 'corruption prices' in goods & services. How does that not reflect additional costs to consumers?
  9. Out of inflation pressures, higher prices for goods & services are sought.
Prime Minister Mr. Najib has promised Malaysians that they will be tabling a public discussion on GST (called the GST Bill) on December. There are also several upsides that could be seen - But until Mr. Najib tables the meeting on GST Bill, we shouldn't be skeptical of anything yet.
Other side of the GST story
GST has been said to promise a few things:
  1. Implementation will not be abrupt. It will be a slow & steady tax preparation so that individuals and small businesses will not be adversely affected.
  2. It will replace the 10+5% services and goods tax. This means taxes are lower now - Consumers need not pay more for one area, but it's divided into many other source of 'tax' payments.
  3. GST rates are promised at 4%, out of the normal 10% or 5% charged in restaurants.
  4. Implementation will not occur until middle to late 2011 or 2012. Planning time is essential to not put 'inflation pressure' on small businesses.
  5. Government's coffers will increase. This will enable further development and budget control to the country, other than relying just on petroleum or income tax revenues.
  6. Tax when consumed, not when earned is much better. It allows better control. Spending influences will be "Careful" and "More controlled" when purchasing on higher prices are made rather than "taxable incomes" generated from work.
  7. It's a broad-based tax system. Some items may be slightly more expensive & cheaper. It's not a overall standardized taxation method.
Your opinion on GST
Of course, there are many pros and cons of the new GST system - And the implementers should look more intricately into all income groups, balance their sheets and understand what are the effects first. While we can only propose so much, there's only so much we can do.
Here are some of the 'preparation techniques' the tablers of the GST Bill can adopt:
  1. Be intricate with details: Tax is a complicated subject, like a science of its own. If you make the subject complicated, it may lead to more misunderstandings and later, more arguments.
  2. Introduce 'layman terms' for further understanding. Giving examples always help. Examples on implementations always help. Tell a story to the public - And make it make sense to them.
  3. Use other form of publicity media: Tabling the GST Bill on national newspapers and mass media isn't going to cut it. Find other means such as introduction campaigns Malaysia-wide.
  4. Engage community understanding: Allow certain private and public (individual or company) figures to table talks and debates on GST Malaysia-wide. This encourages engagement and allows more problems & solutions to be seen.
The Malaysian government or finance department has a long time more (approximately 15 - 20 months) to table talks around Malaysia with regards to GST.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Ken_Low 

Ingin Menjana Pendapatan Online Dengan Hanya Klik Butang "START"?Klik sini sekarang
Read more...

Bookmark and Share

Jutawan Links

Bagaimana Jana $195 - $500 per niche video?
Ketahui Teknik Khas Menjana Pendapatan Tanpa Henti
Teknik Yang Cukup Berkesan
Rebutlah Peluang Yang Terhad Ini
Promosi terhad
Click here for more details

 
Powered By 7HariMahirAdsense.com